Wongfully Convicted #FreeGuyHeinzeJr
|
Social Media Links
Guy's Voice FB Group
Miscellaneous
BBC
Documentary Guy Heinze
Case Study by Daniel J.
Alden
Michael Knox Forensic
Investigator
|
If you are curious about Guy and how he is today, please join the private Facebook Group linked under the Social Media section; it's the first link. Much of the current information concerning Guy, his remaining family, and current legal matters, are being discussed on this page and it is information that cannot be shared via this website. PLEASE SIGN THE PETITION to compel the Georgia Supreme Court to examine Guy's case. At the very least, please read this petition IN FULL to understand why Guy's case needs to be reexamined.Most of us in Coastal Georgia have heard about this tragedy but not many of us know what happened afterwards and how the Glynn County Police Department (GCPD) landed on Guy Heinze, Jr. as the alleged suspect. First, let's look at the murders themselves. There were nine people in a single-wide mobile home in a neighborhood that consists entirely of mobile homes. An average single-wide mobile home is normally 14 feet wide by 65 feet long, the bedrooms no bigger than some people's closets. Many of us have forgotten about Guy Heinze, Jr. and those people who lost their lives in the early morning hours of 29 August 2009: Michelle Toler age 15, Michael Toler age 19, Russell D. Toler, Jr. age 20, Russell D. Toler, Sr. age 44, Chrissy Toler age 22, Joseph L. West age 30, Brenda Gail Falagan age 49, and Guy Heinze, Sr. age 45 years. According to the evidence, each person was beaten until they died, some fought back, a few were held down while being beaten and according to Chief Doering and his investigators on the GCPD, only one man accomplished this abhorrent crime. A man, who upon being interviewed by the police, on camera no less, did not have a single mark upon his body suggesting he had just beaten eight people to death. Why was Guy Heinze, Jr. arrested? First, he was the only survivor from the home, which is an obvious conclusion to draw without evidence, and two, because he had blood on his clothes, thus, he is guilty. Third, he was a drug addict which means a person is automatically guilty of crimes because there are no innocent drug addicts. That is sarcasm by the way. Keep in mind, Guy ended up with blood on his clothes because he walked into his home, like normal, and found his family dead and dying. He ran out screaming for help, a 911 dispatcher told him to go back inside and see if anyone was still breathing; which means he had to touch people. He found Michael still breathing and allegedly laid down to hold him, to comfort him because, of all the people in the home, Michael wouldn't be able to understand what was happening, even in life, Michael was defenseless against such an assault. There were nine victims, eight people lost their lives, one person survived. Had Guy not been a drug addict, maybe things would've turned out differently; but, in the eyes of the law, he was expendable; no one would pine over him going to jail, society wouldn't think it an injustice for a drug addict, there wouldn't be an outpouring of emotion over a person who was living below the poverty level, a person who in the eyes of society was a burden on the tax payers, for such a person to be arrested for murder was no surprise to the citizens. It all fit together, especially when you let drop little "facts" that would spread like wildfire because it leads towards the sensational. Evidence was gathered at the scene of the crime that proved Guy innocent of these murders; evidence that was later "lost" or mishandled in the gathering. The majority of the evidence WAS PUT IN THE BATHTUB in the home, the crime scene! It wasn't individually bagged upon finding, it was piled up with other evidence, for hours, until eventually "tagged and bagged" appropriately. So much cross-contamination and destruction of evidence. To make matters worse, the evidence didn't go straight to the evidence locker. Officer Michael Owens with the GCPD kept evidence overnight before turning it over. Why did Officer Owens keep this evidence overnight? Where was it kept? This was not the first time Officer Owens had mishandled evidence either; he was already under investigation by internal affairs for allegedly mishandling evidence in other cases. Why was this officer allowed on scene to collect evidence in a multiple homicide case? The mistakes go on and on until Guy Heinze, Jr. is tried and convicted of the murders he couldn't physically complete alone; if Guy was guilty, he had help. After all, there is no way one person alone could commit such a crime without incapacitating the victims somehow, thus, where are the co-defendants? Why wasn't anyone else sought? Please watch the BBC documentary. This is a VERY large download, so be mindful if you pay for a data plan. You might be able to find it online every once in a while, or, if you pay for cable TV you might find it in your cable company's streaming catalogue, quite often it is replayed on the National Geographic channel and the BBC channel. Then, please read the Case Study by Daniel J. Alden of the Eye On Innocence Project; a group that has taken up Guy's case to help prove his innocence and get his case reinvestigated. With the political climate in Glynn County today (August 2020), this is the time. I believe every single case D.A. Jackie Johnson has participated in should be reexamined. Thankfully, she lost the recent election (November 2020) and is no longer in office. For those of you who think the county locked up the right man, I ask you to again, look over the REAL FACTS and not the scuttle-butt put out on the street by the police and gossipmongers. Forget the lies told about insurance money payouts and DNA evidence that never materialized but was strongly referenced to by GCPD, and by Doering in particular. Ask yourself why only one man was arrested and no one else was sought out when numerous people put forth other suspects, they named the same person over and over again, a person who is allegedly a member of a violent gang, a person who could get several people together to help them murder an entire household. A person that was overheard telling others that he would "kill the whole family". For the victims to not have been incapacitated first (meaning they weren't rendered unconscious by drugs or carbon monoxide or tied up or restrained some way), how could one man keep nine people inside a single-wide mobile home while he beat each person to death? Evidence does show a struggle ensued during this violent assault, a few of the victims fought hard. Yet Guy didn't have a scratch on him that morning. Ask yourself why Guy himself never wavered in his innocence, why he never blamed others or named names if he had help. Just like us, Guy has no clue who killed his family. |
#FreeGuyHeinzeJr
|
Home
Contact
Site Map
Copyright
©GlynnGen.com All Rights Reserved
Material on this site is one of kind,
having been published here for the first time ever. This data was compiled by
Amy Hedrick
for the GlynnGen website to be used for your personal use and
it is not to be reproduced in any manner on other websites or electronic media,
nor is it to be printed in any resource books or materials. Thank you!